posted April 17, 2012 by Andrew | 2 Comment
Categories: Faster results
Tags: business - clinics - healthcare - homecare - hospitals - patients
Right now, many hospital systems put an inordinate amount of pressure on hospitals. Patients are staying for long periods of time because they have nowhere else to go, doctors are required to perform minor procedures that nurses are trained to perform and many governments don't want to admit that there are other options for those that can afford it. In Canada, approximately 7,500 people are living in hospitals (living is defined as having been there longer than 100 days) because they have nowhere else to go. That costs the system approximately $7.5m every day!!! Does that sound like an efficient system? We need a system where these people have a place to go where they get better care that is more cost effective. The hospital is the most expensive place they can be.
We need to develop local clinics and providers who can take much of this pressure off of hospitals. Hospitals should be a place where people go for emergencies and specific kinds of specialty care, not a catchall where patients stay because they have nowhere else to go. Develop local communities and homecare facilities to support those that need a place to go and be cared for, provide for better home care and give people options when it is time for them to be discharged from hospitals.
Like most businesses, much is lost in the transition from one system process to another. However, in most businesses this leads to lost money and profits. In healthcare, this leads to lost money and lost patients. There are lives at stake here so let's make a better effort to fix the problem.
posted April 04, 2012 by Andrew | Be the First to Comment
Categories: Faster results
Tags: clinics - healthcare - hospitals - integration - medical records - patients - the patient experience
Right now, patients are in the middle of a system where not much is integrated. Their records need to be shared by hospitals, specialists, local clinics, care centres and many other healthcare providers. But currently, patients are pretty much responsible for their own records, or least knowing about their health. Every time you see a specialist or a new doctor, you must go through the same discussion about past medical history and treatments. What happens if I am in a critical situation and am unable to tell anyone my previous history? Technology is advanced enough to have our medical records follow us wherever we go, so we need to create a system where incentives are given to make the patient experience seamless and more integrated. Start locally, then move to regionally and then internationally. Imagine a world where a universal health card stores all of my health records and information and it can be accessed virtually. The technology is there (think bank debit cards), so why not healthcare records? Because people are trying to tackle the system all at once instead of breaking into manageable chunks.
posted March 30, 2012 by Andrew | 2 Comment
Categories: Sustainability
Tags: collaboration gap - GPOs - healthcare - healthcare providers - hospitals - patient outcomes - procurement - suppliers
In the current healthcare system, there is not enough opportunity for healthcare providers (hospitals, group purchasing organizations, shared service organizations, etc.) to collaborate with their suppliers to make better decisions. There are four reasons for this:
- Public scrutiny of healthcare dollars spent has forced many providers to be become more risk averse
- Government purchasing legislation has forced purchasing departments to have much more influence in the buying process
- Providers are short on knowledgable resources
- Providers don't know all of the options available to them.
We need to encourage providers to make smart business decisions and leverage the expertise of their suppliers. Provide for a purchasing process that allows for a discussion between the provider and supplier in order to come up with the best possible solution and outcome. When this doesn't happen, I call it the Collaboration Gap, which is depicted in the visual below.

posted March 07, 2012 by Andrew | Be the First to Comment
Categories: Commentary
Tags: collaboration - collaboration gap - healthcare - hospitals - providers - RFP - suppliers
Listen to this short explanation on what the current collaboration gap is between healthcare suppliers and their customers.
posted January 13, 2011 by Andrew | 4 Comment
Categories: Commentary
After all of the reports and findings from reporters and the Auditor General of Ontario, more legislation has come down on Ontario hospitals. Bill 122 gives hospitals more regulations that they need to follow around the reporting of consultants, about governance and about freedom of information. The interesting part is around freedom of information. On January 1, 2012, hopsitals will be subject to requests for information by anyone in the general public. Obviously there are some restrictions on what can be requested (no patient records or confidential information like that), but it is essentially a free-for-all for anyone that wants to make a request. The interesting part is that the legislation makes requests retroactive for five years. Meaning that requests can be made for information that dates back to 2007, when none of this was even contemplated.
If you work in a hospital, things are about to change, so get used to it.

